Non-Compete Agreements Leave Some Workers With Fewer Options

Mike Ivey has a competitive nature. He’s completed 29 Birkebeiner cross country ski marathons, and with extra time to hit the snow now that he’s mostly retired, he doesn’t plan on slowing down anytime soon.

So it went against those years of racing experience when Madison’s Capital Times newspaper asked Ivey to sign a non-compete agreement as part of the buyout he took after three decades as a reporter.

“I think some of my competitiveness in sports led me to the news business,” Ivey said on a recent afternoon while waxing his skis for an upcoming event. “Being a competitive reporter I wanted to get the scoop. So that really drove me for a long time in the newspaper business. I started as a sports writer.”

The paper asked him to sign a non-compete agreement lasting six months, Ivey recalled, and he was unsure what to do.

“I didn’t really want to rock the boat too much and ruin my severance package. But then I called a friend who is a lawyer, and she said those non-compete agreements are really hard to enforce. And then I thought, ‘I’m not going to sign it,'” Ivey said.

The paper’s executive editor, Paul Fanlund, declined to comment on personnel matters and wouldn’t say if such agreements are standard practice.

In Ivey’s case, he didn’t suffer any repercussions for refusing to sign and has been able to write as a freelancer for other publications. But for others, a non-compete can mean lost income and, for companies, it may reduce their ability to find qualified workers. Additionally, employees who want to leave and start their own business in the same field or geographic area may not be able to do so.

Such agreements are part and parcel of many jobs, everything from fast food joints to tech startups. It’s estimated1 in 5 workers in the United States has a non-compete agreement.

Joe Kirgues runs gener8tor, a Wisconsin-based business accelerator that invests in startups that rely on digital technology, and he argues non-competes put up roadblocks for would-be entrepreneurs and stifle state job growth.

“The arguments for us is the free market,” he said. “We think that competition has been a hallmark of American success. And if you’re looking to foster competition, I don’t think you accomplish that by enforcing an agreement whose title begins with the word ‘non-compete.'”

From Wisconsin Public Radio